Chat   Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ   Arcade 

Board index » Canadian 9/11 Truth » Related Discussions » News to Notice




 Page 5 of 5 [ 66 posts ] Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5



Author Message
 Post subject: Russia Gives Nato 21 Days To Leave Black Sea
 Post Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 6:28 am 
Offline
Truther Elite
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 11:35 pm
Posts: 920
Location: Kitchener, ON
Russia Gives Nato 21 Days To Leave Black Sea
On September 3, 2008, George Norey the host of Coast to Coast which is heard in the US on over 500 Stations and through out the workd, interviewed Steve Qualye.
The bottom line is that Russia has given NATO 21 DAYS to Exit the Black Sea.
Could this be the start of something big?
Could this postpone the USA Election?
There is so much more I could write but I will let the video stand for itself.
This is a serious warning and could create all kinds of problems world wide.
The US Government will be "technically" Bankrupt as of September 30th, so we will see.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uflMj7cD3QY[/youtube]
Here is what the news said today about what is happening.....(no this is not a US report, they only have entertainment in the US, no real news).

A US Navy flagship carrying humanitarian aid yesterday steamed into a Georgian port where Russian troops are still stationed, stoking tensions once again in the tinderbox Caucasus region.

A previous trip by US warships was cancelled at the last minute a week ago amid fears that an armed stand-off could intensify in the Black Sea port of Poti.

The arrival of the USS Mount Whitney, flagship of the 6th Fleet in the Mediterranean, came as Moscow accused Dick Cheney, the hawkish US Vice-President, of stoking tensions during a visit to Tbilisi this week. After meeting President Saakashvili, Mr Cheney vowed to bring Georgia into the Nato alliance. Russia sees such moves as Western encroachment on its traditional sphere of influence.

Russia's leaders have accused previous US warships that docked at the port of Batumi, to the south, of delivering weapons to re-arm the smashed Georgian military — charges that Washington denied.
Related Links * Cheney delivers warning to Moscow * Britain values unity in Nato over Georgia * Georgia linked to Nato early warning system

While Russia again questioned the deployment of what it described as "the number one ship of its type in the US Navy" in the Black Sea, it said that it planned no military action in response. The Russian Army has kept a small component of soldiers in Poti, where Georgian officials accuse them of looting port authority buildings.

"Naval ships of that class can hardly deliver a large amount of aid," said Andrei Nesterenko, a Russian Foreign Ministry spokesman. "Such ships have a hold for keeping provisions for the crew and items needed for sailing. How many tonnes of aid can a ship of that type deliver?"

He said that the presence of US warships could contravene international conventions governing shipping in the Black Sea, and in particular restrictions on the entry of naval ships from countries that do not share a Black Sea coastline. The small Russian garrison in Poti would pose no military threat to a vessel like the Mount Whitney, but the proximity of two hostile forces in such a fraught environment set the political temperature rising again in the Caucasus a month after Russia's five-day war with Georgia.

Moscow, which followed up its crushing military defeat of Georgia by unilaterally recognising two of its breakaway provinces, South Ossetia and Abkhazia, was angry that Mr Cheney still insisted on Georgia's entrance into the Atlantic alliance — something several key Nato members oppose. "The new promises to Tbilisi relating to the speedy membership of Nato strengthen the Saakashvili regime's dangerous feeling of impunity and encourages its dangerous ambitions," said Mr Nesterenko.

Visiting Kiev, the Ukrainian capital yesterday, Mr Cheney kept up his tough anti-Russian rhetoric when he urged Ukraine's squabbling pro-Western leaders to unite in the face of threats to the country's security. He met President Yushchenko and Yuliya Tymoshenko, the Prime Minister, and told them that Ukraine's best hope was to be "united with other democracies".

Mr Yushchenko has accused his former Orange Revolution ally of siding with Russia in the war with Georgia, an allegation she denies. The split led to the collapse of Ukraine's coalition Government on Tuesday.

After endorsing Georgia's application, Mr Cheney said that the US was also committed to Ukraine's membership of Nato. Konstantin Kosachyov, head of the foreign affairs committee in Russia's lower house, accused Mr Cheney of forging an "anti-Russian axis".

_________________
Survival of freedom requires a moral people. Absent this, the Constitution has no meaning, no matter how well written. ~ Ron Paul
http://kitchener911truth.blogspot.com/
http://www.youtube.com/user/Steeper33


Top 
 Post subject: Re: Is this the start of World War III? U.S / Russia
 Post Posted: Wed Sep 10, 2008 6:44 pm 
Offline
Truther Elite
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 11:35 pm
Posts: 920
Location: Kitchener, ON
Czech to finalize US missile shield deal
Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:12:39 GMT
http://www.presstv.com/detail.aspx?id=6 ... =351020606

Image
The Czech government has approved the second and final part of a missile defense deal with the United States despite threats from Russia.

The treaty allows the deployment of US troops at a planned missile defense base near Prague. The Czech government has already approved the main bilateral treaty allowing the US to build a radar base in the country.

Both agreements require the approval of parliament, where they face strong opposition. They should also be signed by President Vaclav Klaus.

Russia had earlier warned that such a move would expose the country to a strike. On Wednesday, a top Russian general, Nikolai Solovtsov, reiterated Moscow's stance on the issue warning that the country's ballistic missiles could target US defense shield in Europe if it is stationed.

The treaty is expected be signed by US Defense Secretary Robert Gates during an informal meeting of NATO defense ministers in London next week, given that it is approved by both Czech Parliament and president.

Czech Defense Minister Vlasta Parkanova said Wednesday that the 34-page document deals with "taxes and the legal status of US soldiers to be deployed at the base".

Parkanova added that the government had succeeded in having many of its demands included in the treaty.

In July, the US and the Czech Republic signed a preliminary agreement to base a radar system near Prague to support 10 US interceptor missiles in Poland.

Poland agreed to host the missiles in exchange for US military aid, including Patriot air defense missiles.

Russia, however, strongly opposes the US planned missile shield in Europe, considering it as a great threat to its security.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
Russia renews missile warnings to US
Wed, 10 Sep 2008 10:14:43 GMT
http://www.presstv.com/Detail.aspx?id=6 ... =351020602

"I can't exclude that if such decisions are taken by our military-political leadership, the missile shield in Poland and the Czech Republic and other such objects could be chosen as designated targets for some of our inter-continental ballistic missiles," General Nikolai Solovtsov was quoted by Interfax as saying.

Russia's threat comes after the US-Russian relations slumped to a post-Cold War low over the recent Georgian conflict. Some analysts view the conflict as a prelude to another cold war.

"We should be sure that the current and future strategic missile forces... are guaranteed to fulfill the task of strategic deterrence," said Solovtsov, the head of Russia's strategic missile forces.

Moscow has been at loggerheads with Washington over the US defense missile system in Europe, dismissing the plan as a jeopardy to its security and military power.

Poland and the United States signed a deal in August on building the site for 10 US missile interceptors on the Baltic Sea by 2012.
___________________________________________________________________________________________

Chavez: Russian bombers for training
Wed, 10 Sep 2008 23:24:45 GMT
http://www.presstv.com/detail.aspx?id=6 ... =351020704

Image
Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez says that two Russian Tu-160 strategic bombers that have landed in Venezuela are for training flights.

"What's more, I'm going to take the controls of one of these monsters," said Chavez, a former paratrooper.

The moves came amid mounting tension between Russia and the United States over various issues, including the presence of US military vessels near the Russian coasts.

Chavez also said plans for joint Russian-Venezuelan naval exercises in the region in November were currently being worked out, and said his closeness to the Kremlin would result in a cooperation that would "strengthen the country."

His announcement confirmed an Interfax report saying the bombers would be in Venezuela for training flights over "neutral waters."

Russia said Monday it was dispatching a nuclear cruiser and other warships and planes to the Caribbean for the joint exercises with Venezuela -- the first such maneuvers in the US vicinity since the Cold War.

Among the Russian ships to take part in the exercises would be the heavy nuclear-powered guided missile cruiser Peter the Great, a vessel with massive firepower whose cruise missiles can deliver nuclear or conventional warheads.

Russian Foreign ministry spokesman Andrei Nesterenko said Monday that the exercises were "not in any way connected to the current situation in the Caucasus," and were "not aimed at any third country."

_________________
Survival of freedom requires a moral people. Absent this, the Constitution has no meaning, no matter how well written. ~ Ron Paul
http://kitchener911truth.blogspot.com/
http://www.youtube.com/user/Steeper33


Top 
 Post subject: Re: US to strike Iran in coming weeks
 Post Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2008 2:53 pm 
Offline
Truther Elite
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 11:35 pm
Posts: 920
Location: Kitchener, ON
US to invade Iran any day now?
September 11, 2008, 20:50
http://www.russiatoday.com/news/news/30312

Image

A few weeks ago the Russian newspaper Izvestia, a well-known and authoritive daily published nationwide and abroad, came forward with something that would have been looked upon as a conspiracy theory if published by a tabloid.

The paper suggested that by attacking South Ossetia, the Georgian President Mikhail Saakashvili had badly damaged a planned U.S. military operation against Iran. In the newspaper's opinion Georgia was supposed to play the role of another "unsinkable aircraft carrier" for the U.S., i.e. an operational and tactical base for U.S.
aircraft that would be making bombing raids into Iran. Something akin to what Thailand was in the Vietnam war.

Thailand certainly benefited from the arrangement, and Georgia would have too, insists the paper, if its President hadn't put his ambitions above the US national interest and ended up beaten, disarmed, chewing on his neckties and totally incapable of providing whatever the U.S. needs from him.

That's why, according to Izvestia in yet another article on the matter, the U.S. response to the Russian retaliation was harsh in words but very mild in action. The latest on the issue suggests that Mikhail Saakashvili may be replaced any day now by direct order from Washington.

Having read the story in Izvestia I decided to try to figure out the extent of improbability and impossibility of the assumptions. As I was doing that, I remembered that early in August CNN had started showing U.S. generals who cried for more troops and hardware for Afghanistan which, in their opinion, was rapidly becoming a more intensive conflict than Iraq.

Shortly after that, a phone call came from a college friend who had just come back from Kandahar in Afghanistan, where he had seen American battle tanks being unloaded from a Ukrainian-registered Antonov-124 "Ruslan", the heaviest and largest cargo airplane in the world. The friend asked if I had any idea what tanks would be good for in Afghanistan, and I said I didn't. It's an established fact from the Soviet war in Afghanistan that tanks are no good for most of the country's mountainous territory. They are good for flatlands, and the main body of flat land in the region is right across the border in Iran.

Later in August there was another bit of unofficial information from a Russian military source: more than a thousand American tanks and armored vehicles had been shipped to Eastern Afghanistan by Ukrainian "Ruslans" flying in three to five shipments a day, and more flights were expected.

Somehow all this, together with the series of articles in Izvestia, the information that all U.S. troops in Afghanistan are going to be reassigned and regrouped under unified command, the arrival of NATO naval ships in the Black Sea, the appointment of a man used to command troops in a combat environment as the new commander of the US Central Command and other bits and pieces. To my total astonishment, when they all fell together the Izvestia story started looking slightly more credible than before.

Today the U.S. media reported that there had been a leak from the Pentagon about a secret Presidential order in which President Bush authorized his military (most of which is currently on Afghan soil) to conduct operations in Pakistan without the necessity for informing the Pakistani government. The U.S. military in Afghanistan - or shall we say in the whole region neighboring Iran - is getting a freer hand by the day. And it is getting more and more hardware to play with.

Of course it's quite clear now that Georgia has lost its immediate potential as a nearby airfield, but after all, the aircraft carriers in the Gulf are not so far away.

Believe me I'm not saying that the U.S. is going to start an all-out war against Iran tomorrow. But aren't there indications that it may happen the day after tomorrow, a month from now, or on any date before the official handover of Presidency in the U.S.? Or, as some suggest, before the election?

I'm just asking the questions. But there are some people, like those working for Izvestia, for instance, who answer them with a "yes".

Evgeny Belenkiy, RT

_________________
Survival of freedom requires a moral people. Absent this, the Constitution has no meaning, no matter how well written. ~ Ron Paul
http://kitchener911truth.blogspot.com/
http://www.youtube.com/user/Steeper33


Top 
 Post subject: Re: US to strike Iran in coming weeks
 Post Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2008 11:19 pm 
Offline
Awake
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 2:21 am
Posts: 26
Man.... :/

_________________
http://chemtrails.scribblewiki.com/

When the "conspiracy" is right in your face you have to look.


Top 
 Post subject: Re: US to strike Iran in coming weeks
 Post Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 10:54 am 
Offline
Truther Elite
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 11:35 pm
Posts: 920
Location: Kitchener, ON
IAEA info suggests Iran worked on nuclear missile
35 minutes ago

VIENNA, Austria - The U.N. nuclear agency has presented intelligence allegedly showing plans to redesign an Iranian missile to accommodate a nuclear payload.

The International Atomic Energy Agency shared the intelligence with 35 nations on Tuesday, but the Iranian representative to the organization says the information was fabricated.

Gregory L. Schulte, the chief U.S. representative to the IAEA, said the evidence shows Iran has a weapons program.

The two spoke separately to reporters after the presentation by the IAEA, one day after the U.N. nuclear watchdog issued a report saying that Iran has stonewalled its attempts to probe allegations that it drew up plans and conducted experiments for a nuclear arms program.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/eu_iran_nuclear

_________________
Survival of freedom requires a moral people. Absent this, the Constitution has no meaning, no matter how well written. ~ Ron Paul
http://kitchener911truth.blogspot.com/
http://www.youtube.com/user/Steeper33


Top 
 Post subject: Re: Is this the start of World War III? U.S / Russia
 Post Posted: Thu Sep 18, 2008 12:58 pm 
Offline
Truther Elite
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 11:35 pm
Posts: 920
Location: Kitchener, ON
America's Arms Warning To Russia
7:13pm UK, Thursday September 18, 2008

The US Defence Secretary has told Sky News that another Russian attack on Georgia once it has joined Nato would result in an American armed response.
Image

Robert Gates told Sky's foreign affairs editor Tim Marshall that Nato's charter would require it.

"I have been a very strong proponent of the view that Nato is a military alliance not a talk shop," he said.

"Article five means what it says - so there is a commitment to go to the assistance of our allies if they are challenged."

It comes after US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice warned Russia that its policies have put it on a path to isolation and irrelevance.

Ms Rice called on the West to stand up to Russian aggression following its invasion of Georgia last month.

"The attack on Georgia has crystallised the course that Russia's leaders are taking and brought us to a critical moment for Russia and the world," she said in a speech released by the State Department.

The speech pledged support for Georgia, highlighting promises of economic aid by the US and European countries.

"In contrast to Georgia's position, Russia's international standing is worse now than at any time since 1991," Ms Rice said.

"And the cost of this self-inflicted isolation has been steep."
http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/World- ... oined_Nato

_________________
Survival of freedom requires a moral people. Absent this, the Constitution has no meaning, no matter how well written. ~ Ron Paul
http://kitchener911truth.blogspot.com/
http://www.youtube.com/user/Steeper33


Top 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 
 Page 5 of 5 [ 66 posts ] Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5




Board index » Canadian 9/11 Truth » Related Discussions » News to Notice


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron